| Acceptance Rate | 28% |
|---|---|
| Submission To Final Decision: | 60-90 Days |
| Acceptance To Publication | 30-40 Days |
• The Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences
(JGIAS) is fully consistent with the COPE Principles of Transparency and
Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct. More details can be
found here: Publication
• We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all
possible measures against publication malpractices. Society for Innovative
Agriculture as a publisher takes its duties of guardianship over all stages
of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other
responsibilities. To that purpose, all the actors of a JGIAS publication,
authors, reviewers and members of the editorial team are expected to fully
adhere to our policy regarding publication ethics and malpractice, and
respect the following statements:
• To sustain precise records of data related with their
submitted manuscript, and to supply or deliver access to these data, on
sensible request. Where suitable and where acceptable by employer, finance
body and others who influence have an attention, to submitted data in an
appropriate storage location, for allocation and advance use by others.
• To endorse that the manuscript as submitted is not under consideration or
acknowledged for publication elsewhere. Where lot of the content commonality
with printed or submitted content, to recognize and cite those sources.
Furthermore, to provide the editor with a copy of any submitted manuscript
that might cover overlying or closely related content.
• To check that all the work in the submitted manuscript is novel and to
accept and cite content repeated from other sources. To attain agreement to
duplicate any content from other sources.
• To announce any possible conflicts of interest where the author has an
opposing interest that could be observed as applying an undue inspiration on
his or her responsibilities at any stage throughout the publication process.
• To inform punctually the journal editor or publisher if a substantial
error in their publication is recognized. To conjoin with the editor and
publisher to publish an erratum, addition, corrigendum sign, or to withdraw
the paper, where this is considered necessary. COPE Role of an Author
• Performance in a sensible, objective and nondiscriminatory
way while resonant out their probable duties, without perception on grounds
of gender, sexual orientation, spiritual or political beliefs, cultural or
ecological origin of the authors.
• Appliance the realistic procedures in the occasion of objections of any
conflict nature, in agreement with the guidelines and events of the Society
where applicable. In any complaints authors have reasonable opportunity to
respond. All objections would be inspected no problem when the imaginative
publication was accepted. Certification linked with any such objections
should be reserved. COPE Role of an Editor
• To contribute to the decision-making procedure, and to facilitate in
enlightening the value of the published paper by reviewing the manuscript
accurately, in a timely manner
• To maintain the privacy of any material supplied by the editor or author.
To not keep or copy the manuscript.
• To aware the editor to some published or submitted content that is
significantly similar to that under review.
• To be a responsive of any prospective conflicts of interest (economically,
official, combined or other associations between the reviewer and author)
and to aware the editor to these, if required withdrawing their facilities
for that manuscript. COPE Role of a Reviewer
